AGDInteractive - Sierra Adventure Game Remakes Forum

So you think insulting a mod is safe as long as he doesn't have admin-rights? He he, I still suggest you try and be a little more considerate in what you post. It's better, trust me.

Besides, there are four admins on this board, and only two mods. The odds are stacked against you.

Whats the bit deal? Sheesh.

Basically, if you like posting here, it's best to follow their rules and show some respect to the mods and admins. Insulting a mod is like digging your own grave.

Yeah, don't treat Navy or Adeyke like the mindless-overweight gobs of grease they are!!!!!!

Yeah, uh, basically, it's just not showing a whole lot of tact, man.

Bt

Well his the one that made the big deal. All I said was its a cool idea. I have a right to my own thoughts thank you.

Try analysing what he wrote, and then examine all the posts you've made so far.

adeyke wrote:I'm really starting to get tired of your post-pumping, Rog.

He's not saying that you don't have the right to an opinion, he's pointing out the fact that most of your posts add little value to the discussion, that they do nothing more than add to your postcount. He does have the right to point that out to you since he's in charge of maintaining order in the forums. It certainly did not warrant that kind of response from you.

Fine. I guess all the mods must have the last word.

Rog wrote:Fine. I guess all the mods must have the last word.

Yeah, well, it may not ALWAYS be fair, but that's the way the cookies crumble. Unless you put together a well constructed, well written response to what you felt was an uneccessary statement.

Bt

Blackthorne519 wrote:Unless you put together a well constructed, well written response to what you felt was an uneccessary statement.

And submit it privately to either the mod or admin in question. We don't tolerate people publically questioning a mod or admin's decision. We'll be more than happy to discuss the situation privately, though.

Erpy wrote: I've never seen a forum that had a folder specifically for locked threads and I figure there's a reason for this. It's not worth it.

Here's one http://forums.somethingawful.com/forumd ... forumid=25

Was it really necessary to bump a thread more than a year old just to tell me there is a forum (It seems. The page you linked to simply tells me I'm not registered.) where every thread that gets locked for some reason is put in a separate folder?

In the end, the verdict remains...most threads that get locked don't need to be archived.