Thanks a lot, that seems to clear it up <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> I withdraw. :] <p></p><i></i>

"Waked" you need in one syllable? What about "roused" or "stirred"? <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>And if the "that" isn't supposed ...

But, come on, that's an error, plain as day... would you have Val say "putted" if you needed "put" in a past form to have two syllables..?<br><br>She sings -<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>When I saw you<br>I knew it was true<br>There's a love between us<br>that won't be to...

I know it would be an implementing hell, but I wonder just how a game would look sporting TWO interfaces simultaneously. Both clicking AND pointing... that might be interesting <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/images/emoticons/smile.gif ALT=":)"...

Am I unaware of a weird language form, or has the past-participle of "wake" always been "woken"..? <p></p><i></i>