Page 1 of 1
"waked" in Valanice's song??
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2003 7:28 pm
by MaXxX
Am I unaware of a weird language form, or has the past-participle of "wake" always been "woken"..? <p></p><i></i>
Re: "waked" in Valanice's song??
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2003 8:29 pm
by Erpy
Waked can be spoken in one syllable. Woken always contains two. It was done in order to maintain the flow.<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="
http://httpd.chello.nl/c.vanempel/Nashn ... <!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
oh come on...
Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2003 11:50 pm
by MaXxX
But, come on, that's an error, plain as day... would you have Val say "putted" if you needed "put" in a past form to have two syllables..?<br><br>She sings -<br><br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>When I saw you<br>I knew it was true<br>There's a love between us<br>that won't be torn in two<br>once waked from sleep<br>I'll smile and speak<br>we'll open a door<br>forever more</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--><br><br>If I were to take part in composing/arranging this piece, I'd add another note before the one that has "once" sung to it, seeing as there's a long pause after "torn in two" anyway. It'd turn from "once waked from sleep" at G-G-A-A# into "once woken from sleep" at F-G-G-A-A# with the F placed at the end of a preceding measure, and all'd be well.<br><br>You speak of order and flow, however, but the song contains yet another inconsistence. The displayed lyrics go "There's a love between us that won't be torn in two" but it's sung at D D# F G-F F ("there's a love between us") D D# F F A ("won't be torn in two") whereas "that" is not sung at all, not even piggybacked to another syllable.<br><br>Saying that it should end with "<!--EZCODE BOLD START--><strong>the</strong><!--EZCODE BOLD END--> door", seeing as there's only one door holding Val in the tower - only one door that matters, that is, as the silly wooden-barred one is hardly a problem - they don't have much of a choice in doors to open - would probably be plain impertinence of me, so I won't mention it :P ... oops? my word, I <!--EZCODE UNDERLINE START--><span style="text-decoration:underline">do</span><!--EZCODE UNDERLINE END--> type faster than I think... Oh well. Not a good sign for my thinking, is it. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=
http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Re: oh come on...
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 12:02 am
by Erpy
<!--EZCODE QUOTE START--><blockquote><strong><em>Quote:</em></strong><hr>You speak of order and flow, however, but the song contains yet another inconsistence. The displayed lyrics go "There's a love between us that won't be torn in two" but it's sung at D D# F G-F F ("there's a love between us"<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=
http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> D D# F F A ("won't be torn in two"<!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=
http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> whereas "that" is not sung at all, not even piggybacked to another syllable.<hr></blockquote><!--EZCODE QUOTE END--><br><br>Which is exactly why it isn't sung and why woken wouldn't be sung either. Our writer tends to be somewhat compulsive regarding the metrum.<br><br>As for "the door", I really wonder if it was supposed to be taken literally. My guess is that it isn't.<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="
http://httpd.chello.nl/c.vanempel/Nashs ... <!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
Re: oh come on...
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 12:58 am
by Pidgeot
When it comes to songs, it is allowed to "bend" language rules, as long as it's done with moderataion. <p>Pidgeot<br>-----<br><!--EZCODE ITALIC START--><em>Every error you find is the last one.</em><!--EZCODE ITALIC END--></p><i></i>
One-syllabled words
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 1:30 am
by MaXxX
"Waked" you need in one syllable? What about "roused" or "stirred"? <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=
http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>And if the "that" isn't supposed to be sung, why is it in the lyrics? <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=
http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br><br>Eek, I sense I'm venturing too far into "bitching" territory. Not my intent, for sure! I just hope your more-strict-on-metrum-than-on-language songwriter doesn't have to bend the language in that severe a manner in your QfG2 project, which I just cannot wait for! <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=
http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Re: One-syllabled words
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 1:33 am
by Erpy
Well, seeing that there's no song in QFG2, that won't be likely.<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="
http://httpd.chello.nl/c.vanempel/Nashg ... <!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
Re: One-syllabled words
Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2003 3:10 am
by Vildern
In many poems I've noticed mistakes, made deliberately by the poet, in order to maintain the 'flow', as Erpy put it, or: , generally speaking, the rhyming. Rhyming is most important in poems. It's a known technique <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START ;) --><img src=
http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... s/wink.gif ALT=";)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <br> <p><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="
http://www.navynuke.net/ezboard/vilsig.gif" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br><br></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=
http://pub57.ezboard.com/broyalquestfor ... Vildern</A> at: 11/9/03 9:14 pm<br></i>
Re: One-syllabled words
Posted: Tue Nov 11, 2003 1:50 am
by Tom Lewandowski
Hmmm...I wonder if some of those Rappers realize how poor the grammar is in some of their ... raps ... and if they receive rebuttle over the proper use of a given word.<br> <p></p><i></i>
Re: One-syllabled words
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 5:38 pm
by Cadbury Wookie
Thank you, all.<br><br>'Preciate the support. <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=
http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> <p></p><i></i>
Re: One-syllabled words
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:44 pm
by MuzlakOofmay
What happened to your post count, Tom? <p>---------<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="
http://www.nancycarterdesign.com/bryce/sign.jpg" style="border:0;"/><!--EZCODE IMAGE END--><br>"I'm a lumberjack and I'm O.K."<br>----------<br><!--EZCODE LINK START--><a href="
http://www.nancycarterdesign.com/spongefactory/" target="top">Sponge Factory</a><!--EZCODE LINK END--></p><i></i>
Re: One-syllabled words
Posted: Wed Nov 12, 2003 8:45 pm
by Erpy
He switched from a local to a global account and I transferred his title and forum access rights over to his new account, but I can't transfer his post count.<br><br><!--EZCODE IMAGE START--><img src="
http://httpd.chello.nl/c.vanempel/Nashs ... <!--EZCODE IMAGE END--> <p></p><i></i>
uhhh
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 12:08 am
by halfman
wake1 ( P ) Pronunciation Key (wk)<br>v. woke, (wk) or waked (wkt) waked, or wok·en (wkn) wak·ing, wakes<br>v. intr.<br><br> 1.<br> 1. To cease to sleep; become awake: overslept and woke late.<br> 2. To stay awake: Bears wake for spring, summer, and fall and hibernate for the winter.<br> 3. To be brought into a state of awareness or alertness: suddenly woke to the danger we were in.<br> 2. To keep watch or guard, especially over a corpse.<br><br><br>It's a real word. <p></p><i></i>
Ah, so it WAS a form I was oblivious to.
Posted: Thu Nov 13, 2003 2:29 am
by MaXxX
Thanks a lot, that seems to clear it up <!--EZCODE EMOTICON START :) --><img src=
http://www.ezboard.com/intl/aenglish/im ... /smile.gif ALT=":)"><!--EZCODE EMOTICON END--> I withdraw. :] <p></p><i></i>
Re: Ah, so it WAS a form I was oblivious to.
Posted: Sun Nov 16, 2003 5:31 am
by Fender178
I have never noticed that in the game it slelf but it dont really matter though. <p></p><i>Edited by: <A HREF=
http://pub57.ezboard.com/broyalquestfor ... nder178</A> at: 11/15/03 11:33 pm<br></i>
When I Saw You
Posted: Mon Nov 17, 2003 1:30 pm
by mjartisian
How could anyone possibly complain about such a beautiful song?<br><br>Haven't you ever heard of 'poetic license'? <p></p><i></i>
Re: When I Saw You
Posted: Tue Nov 18, 2003 12:24 am
by Tom Lewandowski
Yeah! And besides, you forget that the Wookie drinks (but only to excess, and in crowds of one or more) and sometimes gets things a little up-mixed.<br> <p></p><i></i>